Cyberharasser’s Abusive Use of DMCA

Hmm, and GL too. Another pea in an ugly assed pod. Seems it may be time to drag out the Roach meme. That was a gift to ME. No fake DMCA filing for you, at least not here, loser boy.

Stop Cyber Abuse

dmcaOn March 13, 2014, the Judiciary Committee of the United States House of Representatives, through its Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property and the Internet, held a hearing regarding the copyright infringement notice and takedown procedures set forth in 17 U.S.C. § 512, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) is a copyright law in the United States.  On October 12, 1998, the United States Senate passed by unanimous vote, and President Bill Clinton signed into law on October 28, 1998, an amendment to Title 17 of the United States Code to extend the reach of copyright.  The amendment also limited liability of providers of online services for copyright infringement by their users.

At the Judiciary Committee hearing, Representative Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) introduced the hearing by identifying three issues of particular interest to him: (1) the “whack-a-mole” problem copyright owners face, whereby infringing material that has been…

View original post 1,392 more words

Lies And Scare Tactics. A Little Knowledge Goes A Long Way

Stop Cyber Abuse

On November 22, 2015, I made a blog administrator’s decision. Out of spite, the person who asked for my help and communicated with me for the greater part of 11 months, went into revenge mode. He has me over a barrel. Because there is pending litigation, I am restrained from giving details publicly about what took place.  Indeed, I can barely post “Good morning” on Twitter or this blog without him calling his attorney complaining that I am interfering in his “cases,” or talking about “his business” or “bad-mouthing” him.

On the other hand, while I am restrained from sharing certain information, he has no restraints and has gone public with his lies, harassment and the carrying out of his threats.  Therefore, I am compelled to share some knowledge to settle any concerns or fears based on his most recent misrepresentation.

I didn’t want to do this, but knowledge is…

View original post 2,338 more words

Re-newsit Blogger Ordered to Pay for Defamation

Stop Cyber Abuse

defamation-imageDenise Souriall has updated her website with the good news.

Ted Wafer was charged with the November 2, 2013 death of Renisha McBride.

In August 2014, Wafer was convicted for second-degree murder, manslaughter and the use of a firearm in the commission of a felony.  Wafer has settled a lawsuit for wrongful death with Renisha McBride’s family.

Denise’s case is one that dispels the theories that only those on social media are targeted for harassment and/or defamation.  Denise was minding her own business.  A newspaper interviewed her because she was once acquainted with Ted Wafer.

Meanwhile, in November 2013, David Piercy reached out to Michigan media to promote his Justice for Ted Wafer Facebook page.  He appeared on camera.

Bringing up another layer supporting Ted Wafer was Vicki Pate, who apparently read Denise’s interview, and went on a doxing campaign to get Denise’s personal information.  Finding a docket for a…

View original post 632 more words

Twitter Class Action Lawsuits

We Hold These Truths To Be Self-Evident

TwitterIf you or someone you know is a resident of the State of California as of October 27, 2015, and had a Twitter account on or before November 2009, you might want to know the following.

Twitter has been sued, and agreed to settle a class action lawsuit alleging that it violated user’s privacy rights by disclosing the full names provided by users without warning. The lawsuit also alleges that Twitter shared users’ public tweets and public profile information with third parties without providing adequate disclosure, and by failing to adequately inform its users that their tweets would be public by default.

The class action lawsuit was filed by a former Twitter user who opened an account in September 2009. The plaintiff, known as Jane Doe, alleges breach of contract, invasion of privacy, wrongful publication of private facts, intentional misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, negligence, misappropriate, and violation of the Consumer Legal…

View original post 274 more words