Cyberharasser’s Abusive Use of DMCA

Hmm, and GL too. Another pea in an ugly assed pod. Seems it may be time to drag out the Roach meme. That was a gift to ME. No fake DMCA filing for you, at least not here, loser boy.

Stop Cyber Abuse

dmcaOn March 13, 2014, the Judiciary Committee of the United States House of Representatives, through its Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property and the Internet, held a hearing regarding the copyright infringement notice and takedown procedures set forth in 17 U.S.C. § 512, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) is a copyright law in the United States.  On October 12, 1998, the United States Senate passed by unanimous vote, and President Bill Clinton signed into law on October 28, 1998, an amendment to Title 17 of the United States Code to extend the reach of copyright.  The amendment also limited liability of providers of online services for copyright infringement by their users.

At the Judiciary Committee hearing, Representative Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) introduced the hearing by identifying three issues of particular interest to him: (1) the “whack-a-mole” problem copyright owners face, whereby infringing material that has been…

View original post 1,392 more words

Lies And Scare Tactics. A Little Knowledge Goes A Long Way

Stop Cyber Abuse

On November 22, 2015, I made a blog administrator’s decision. Out of spite, the person who asked for my help and communicated with me for the greater part of 11 months, went into revenge mode. He has me over a barrel. Because there is pending litigation, I am restrained from giving details publicly about what took place.  Indeed, I can barely post “Good morning” on Twitter or this blog without him calling his attorney complaining that I am interfering in his “cases,” or talking about “his business” or “bad-mouthing” him.

On the other hand, while I am restrained from sharing certain information, he has no restraints and has gone public with his lies, harassment and the carrying out of his threats.  Therefore, I am compelled to share some knowledge to settle any concerns or fears based on his most recent misrepresentation.

I didn’t want to do this, but knowledge is…

View original post 2,338 more words

Twitter: Tweet and delete, a cowards best defense

This will keep a lot of people very busy!

Frankly My Dear I Don't Give a Damn

Stay tuned. A blog is being prepared to show the readers how a particular user often Tweets, then deletes various threats, harassment and other such Twitter TOS violations. While Twitter doesn’t allow for deleted tweets as part of evidence, we do. Screenshots are a beautiful thing and we have many from stalkerboy. If you would also like to share your screenshots of this particular form of harassment, please contact us at »»»

All victims identity will be protected, as well as the identity of the submitters.

Written by :Bonnie Blue

View original post

Re-newsit Blogger Ordered to Pay for Defamation

Stop Cyber Abuse

defamation-imageDenise Souriall has updated her website with the good news.

Ted Wafer was charged with the November 2, 2013 death of Renisha McBride.

In August 2014, Wafer was convicted for second-degree murder, manslaughter and the use of a firearm in the commission of a felony.  Wafer has settled a lawsuit for wrongful death with Renisha McBride’s family.

Denise’s case is one that dispels the theories that only those on social media are targeted for harassment and/or defamation.  Denise was minding her own business.  A newspaper interviewed her because she was once acquainted with Ted Wafer.

Meanwhile, in November 2013, David Piercy reached out to Michigan media to promote his Justice for Ted Wafer Facebook page.  He appeared on camera.

Bringing up another layer supporting Ted Wafer was Vicki Pate, who apparently read Denise’s interview, and went on a doxing campaign to get Denise’s personal information.  Finding a docket for a…

View original post 632 more words

Twitter policy encourages abuse–AKA: Twitter Wars

Frankly My Dear I Don't Give a Damn

Are you victim? Are you a bully? Has Twitter consistently allowed a blocked user abuse, stalk, post and then delete threats/harassment, thus allowing the nutcase to remain safely within their TOS, as deleted Tweets do not count?

The phone rings in the middle of the night. Panic sets in. The late night phone call is never good news, right? On the other end, a drunken, unemployed, self proclaimed Twitter guru,  hurls accusations at you, threatens to kill you and your family. He records the calls, publishes them on youtube, links to them via his main Twitter account, though he has many. He then tags your Twitter account, daring you to interact with him, over his threats. Dutifully, you report the Tweets, depending on content, for violation of TOS for tagging from behind a block to threats and harassment.

Of course, it takes Twitter several days to get to your claim…

View original post 358 more words